It is important to make legal distinctions between
Foundation- and grantee-produced information.
For legal reasons, it is important to make a distinction between information and
material produced by our Foundation and those generated by grantees with
Foundation funding. Page nine shows two columns: one lists the information
produced by our Foundation and the other lists grantee materials. Legally our
Foundation must review and handle the information differently, particularly when
our name is included in grantees’ policy and advocacy efforts.
Our Foundation legally owns all electronic and published information
produced or commissioned by us with nongrant dollars and that bear our name and
logo. We are legally responsible for its content and, therefore, have internal
policies in place to conduct legal reviews. This information includes: our
brochure; newsletter Portfolio; www.tcwf.org; Reflections series; news releases
printed on our letterhead; print or broadcast advertisements purchased as media
buys directly by the Foundation; commissioned polls, surveys and evaluations;
and
commissioned video productions.
Why the legal reviews? Most of our Foundation-produced materials tell the
stories of grantees and their work, and this translates into real people and
real issues, some of them controversial,
sensitive or heart-wrenching. We take great care to accurately present their
lives with dignity and communicate with clarity the complex issues they address.
We also write about grantees’ work in some areas that are inherently
controversial. For example, we have written about grantees that address the role
of guns in perpetrating violence against youth, and have shared information
about organizations that promote responsible access to contraceptives among
teens to prevent unplanned pregnancies. We also conduct legal reviews to make
sure we do not inadvertently misrepresent issues and to make clear that the
Foundation’s role is strictly that of a funder without legal responsibility for
grantees’ activities.
However, when it comes to disseminating materials that the grantees themselves
produce, which include briefing information, advocacy materials or public
education campaigns, the role of the Foundation’s legal review is different. The
Foundation often funds organizations to address health-related public policy
issues, and this has included funding advocacy groups to speak on behalf of
underserved populations on access to health care, for example. Such information
produced by the grantee is owned by the grantee, not the Foundation, so we do
not conduct legal reviews or content editing when only our funding credit is
mentioned.
If the grantee asks us for permission to include our name, logo and Foundation
information, or to quote Foundation board or staff in its materials, then the
information must go through our Foundation’s legal review process before the
grantee can release it. We do not edit the grantee’s
information, however, because we could assume liability for its content.
However, upon reviewing the information and how we are represented, we reserve
the right to decline its use of our name, logo and quotes of TCWF staff in its
materials if we believe it is not consistent with our mission or is
inappropriately presented. If we find that information on the Foundation is
inaccurate, we can
correct it without assuming liability for the grantee-produced information. But
our information is the only content we edit.
|